Theology of the Body news and discussion, Natural Family Planning Q & A and Prayer Community
Follow on Twitter
Showing posts with label obama agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama agenda. Show all posts

9.30.2011

Freedom of religion on the line! Write now!

Bishops nationwide are urging their parishioners and concerned citizens to write before midnight tonight to prevent the Department of Health and Human Services from providing 100% coverage for contraception and sterilization services as part of Obamacare. Contraception would include the emergency contraception, such as Ella, pictured left. Emergency contraception can act as an abortifacient, should the woman be fertile, prohibiting implantation of a fertilized egg, thus aborting the embryo.

Objections of conscience are being accepted until 11:59 p.m. Friday. There are several methods to communicate to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, by form letter or email, or contacting you congresspeople.

Visit this site to send your emails or pre-written forms now.

12.16.2010

Are you concerned about "Net Neutrality?" You should be!

At first glance, net neutrality seems like a good thing, a way to keep rates from going up, and keep internet providers from overcharging for downloading, surfing, viewing videos, and so on. But if it were that simple, maybe there would be more transparency in what Obama and the FCC are planning: to introduce these net neutrality rules on December 20 and approve them immediately. No one but the FCC can see the contents of these rules.

What is hidden, is what the Huffington Post's Joseph A. Palermo commissioned to Obama last year: to use the FCC to "lock in this advantage" and guarantee ""progressive social change." By making the internet a Title II entity, and providing internet for everyone, governmental regulations come right along with it.

The internet will then be state controlled media, akin to the Fairness Doctrine that looms for radio broadcasting that disagree with the State. The mainstream media already belongs to the State, next will come radio and internet.

Say goodbye to the First Amendment as we know it!

Do you see changes coming down the pike? Is net neutrality and a state controlled internet a threat to First Amendment rights?

More on the Fairness Doctrine:
http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/08/net-neutrality-what-it-really-means.html
On Title II:
http://precursorblog.com/content/the-multi-billion-dollar-impact-fcc-title-ii-broadband-google-entire-internet-ecosystem
Sign a petition:
http://www.grassfire.com/141/petition.asp

11.19.2010

What do you think of the CCHD?

The more I learn about the CCHD, the anti-poverty fundraising arm of the USCCB, the more questions open up. There are many layers to this dilemma, starting with Saul Alinsky's influence on priests involved in the CHD, the CHD's funding of questionable community organizing groups, (not to perform the corporal works of mercy), the excess of money that has been circulating, well beyond the earmarked amount, and much of it coming from our contributions.

Read this article before you decide to give to this weekend's second collection.

10.28.2010

Bringing faith into the voting booth: A Catholic Voter's Guide

In 1960, then-presidential candidate John F. Kennedy sought to quell fears that his faith would dictate his policies should he be elected president.

Speaking to an audience of unconvinced Protestant ministers, he said: “I believe in an America … where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be a Catholic) how to act and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote. … I believe in an America … where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the pope, the National Council of Churches, or any other ecclesiastical source.”

Is JFK’s statement, questionable in its validity for a Catholic president of the United States, a guideline for the Catholic voter? Are Catholics are obliged to take their faith into the voting booth?

Bishop William Lori, of the Diocese of Bridgeport, in his recently published Pastoral Letter, “Let Freedom Ring”, http://www.bridgeportdiocese.com/folder_bridgedocs/let-freedom-ring.pdf, addressed the issues of religious freedom and the Catholic vote in Connecticut.  Appealing to the Catholic voting conscience, he instructs: “We are free not merely to do what we like but rather to do what we ought. God created us free so that we could embrace the truth in love and to do good for ourselves, our families and loved ones, and the larger society. Freedom and truth go together, as Pope John Paul II reminded us, just as freedom and responsibil­ity also go together.”

What makes a Catholic voter Catholic? Is it church attendance? A Baptismal certificate? A Confirmation name?  Many Catholics possess these things, but fewer have the necessary element: an informed conscience.

Truth in the 21st century means something different to each person. It goes something like this: “my truth may not be your truth.”  This is a conscience that has moved away from natural law.  “The natural Law,” Bishop Lori says, “is that sense of right and wrong, etched in the human heart by the Creator.”  The natural law, Lori states, while not specifically Catholic, is “a sound framework for entering more vigorously into debates over cultural and legal challenges.” He advises Catholics to familiarize themselves with natural law tradition so Catholics are equipped to face the hard questions and issues with a prayerful Catholic understanding. A Catholic’s responsibility includes seeking the truth that is for the good of the larger society.

These questions are increasingly more urgent as technology and science continue to evolve. Venerable John Paul II, repeatedly reaffirmed that lawmakers have a “grave and clear obligation to oppose” any law that attacks human life. For lawmakers, as for every Catholic, it is problematic to promote such laws or to vote for them.

What are the issues that attack human life? Tim Staples, of Catholic Answers, a Catholic evangelization organization from California, categorizes those life issues into “Five Non-Negotiable Issues” facing the Catholic voter today. These are some hot button issues that have polarized our society. However, Staples explains, “These are things that are intrinsically immoral, and no Catholic, be they a politician or a Catholic who is voting for a politician, can ever support in any way.” 

The Five Non Negotiable Issues are: abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning, and same-sex “marriage”.  All of these issues attack human life on some level. These issues are the ones where the call to examine and contemplate natural law are needed to honestly form the Catholic conscience.

Abortion is a direct and intentional killing of a human being, and is therefore, homicide. The Catholic Church and many other Christian denominations are in agreement that abortion deprives an innocent human being of its basic right to life. For more on when life begins, visit here. http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/fetal_homicide_laws/

Euthanasia is also a form of homicide. The Church teaches that suicide or taking the life of another person, even disguised as a merciful act, is no one’s right but God’s (Dt 32:39). Compassion is false if its modus operandi is intrinsically evil.  For more on Euthanasia visit here-http://catholiceducation.org/articles/euthanasia/eu0006.html

Embryonic stem cell research is another misplaced form of compassion at the expense of human life. The human embryo is also human life, and deserves dignity and rights under the law. The United States Council of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) condemns embryonic stem cell research as an assault on human life, asserting that "science does not have to kill in order to cure."  This is especially true, since the field of adult stem cell research is a valid and effective scientific field of research. For more on the Embryonic Stem Cell debate visit here-http://www.insidecatholic.com/feature/eight-questions-about-the-stem-cell-debate.html

Human Cloning is a dual life issue because the act of “conception” occurs through technology, rather than through the marital act. Additionally, human cloning ends up being a form of homicide, through the destruction of rejected or unsuccessful clones. For more on human cloning visit here: http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=2968&CFID=55796463&CFTOKEN=73462741

Same sex “marriage” is a difficult issue to understand as Catholics, being such a popular issue of the day. Reiterating Catholic teaching, Bishop Lori says, “Sacramental marriage is ordered toward the procreation and education of children.”  The institution of traditional marriage is crucial to the continuation of the human race.

But not only Catholics understand it as a life issue.  Gandhi had clear opinions on sexual intercourse outside of procreation. In 1930, he said “If mutual consent makes a sexual act moral, whether within marriage or without, and, by parity of reasoning, even between members of the same sex, the whole basis of sexual morality is gone and nothing but misery and defect awaits the youth of the country… There is hope for a decent life only so long as the sexual act is definitely related to the conception of precious life.”   

The Family Institute of Connecticut (FIC), a Hartford-based organization, works to encourage and strengthen the family as the foundation of society, an endeavor which advances the Catholic Church’s view of the family as the “primary and fundamental cell of society.” FIC strives to promote sound ethical and moral values in Connecticut culture and government, with a lobbying arm, a political action arm, and an education and research arm. While not exclusively Catholic, FIC’s director, Peter Wolfgang, works to educate and form the Christian conscience to aid Catholics and all people of faith to make right decisions in the voting booth.

“In spite of all the opposition we face in this bluest of states,” says Wolfgang, “our influence is remarkable and continues to grow. We are excited about our success [with] … issues concerning the traditional family, the sanctity of life, and faith issues in Connecticut. We have made tremendous strides in defending religious liberty, promoting strong pro-family legislators, and lobbying on behalf of our cherished values.”

Wolfgang and Bishop Lori have defended religious freedom side-by-side in “the bluest of states” where, over the past three years, the freedom to exercise religion, especially the Catholic faith, have been under constant attack. To equip voters to make informed choices, the FIC has published candidates’ stances as they relate to the "five non-negotiables". Find the information here: http://www.ctfamily.org/FIC%20Action%20Committee%20Endorsements%202010.pdf and http://www.ctcatholic.org/documents/Surveyresults2010.pdf

While there are “five non-negotiables”, the Church has clear teachings on many key issues that face society and the world today. Evangelium Vitae attempts a small but formidable list of violations of the right to life, human dignity and the integrity of the person. Among them, respect for every life, including criminals and unjust aggressors, murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, or wilful self-destruction, mutilation, torments inflicted on body or mind, attempts to coerce the will itself; subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where people are treated as mere instruments of gain rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others like them are infamies indeed.

What is the remedy? Bishop Lori instructs, being intellectually, morally, and spiritually equipped as citi­zens and believers, with well-formed and informed consciences, “we need to bring into the public square a keen awareness of our rights to assert and bear witness to that moral truth which protects human dignity and makes for a just and peaceful society.”

Among Catholic voters, there is work to be done. Bishop Lori impels Catholics to take steps to know what the Church actually believes and teaches, not just what late-night comedians ridicule. Archbishop Fulton Sheen once commented "There are not over a hundred people in the United States who hate the Catholic Church. There are millions, however, who hate what they wrongly believe to be the Catholic Church.” This is true even among Catholics.  

“It is our glory and our responsibility as citizens to con­scientiously exercise our right to vote. We need to ask our candi­dates where they stand on the issues … illumined by the Church’s social teaching,” says Lori.  Armed with the knowledge of our faith, the issues of the day and how they relate to Catholic social teaching, Catholics can bring a culture of life back to the “bluest of states”, and instruct and inform family, friends and colleagues what the Church really teaches.

Venerable John Paul II says, “The Gospel of life is not for believers alone: it is for everyone. Although faith provides special light and strength, this question arises in every human conscience which seeks the truth and which cares about the future of humanity.”

And who knows, maybe a Catholic politician or two will have a new understanding of what it means to be a Catholic in office and at the polls.


Linda Gaboardi is a mom of three, music teacher, writer and lecturer on women’s health. Along with her husband Kevin, Linda is a certified Natural Family Planning instructor through the Couple to Couple League International, www.ccli.org, where she instructs couples to monitor fertility naturally, without medication or hormones. Contact Linda at nfp4life@snet.net . 




For more information, visit these links:













3.24.2010

Bart Stupak’s abortion misstep - chicagotribune.com

Etymology: Eponym for Rep. Bart Stupak.

Function: verb

1: In a legislative process, to obstruct passage of a proposed law on the basis of a moral principle (i.e. protecting the unborn), accumulating power in the process, then at a key moment surrendering in exchange for a fig leaf, the size of which varies according to the degree of emasculation of said legislator and/or as a reflection of just how stupid people are presumed to be. (Slang: backstabber.)

Poor Bart Stupak. The man tried to be a hero for the unborn, and then, when all the power of the moment was in his frail human hands, he dropped the baby.

Now, in the wake of his decision to vote "yes" for a health care bill that expands public funding for abortion, he is vilified and will be forever remembered as the guy who Stupaked health care reform and the pro-life movement.

Of all the disappointed activists, Brian Burch, president of CatholicVote.org and creator of StandWithStupak.com, was perhaps the most demonstrative in his support of pro-life Democrats. He even created a video with a remake of the final battle scene from "Braveheart."

A helmeted British Barack Obama says, "Our cavalry will ride them down like grass. … Full attack!" Whereupon, Stupak, eyeglasses incongruously perched on his blue-painted face, commands his pitchfork army, "Steady. … Hold, hold, hold."

Alas, Stupak couldn't hold.

Read the article

Posted using ShareThis

9.10.2009

Support this movie before we have to support OBAMACARE




Please visit the Blood Money Film website and register your support of this film. If the creators of the film can show there is support for seeing this film in theaters they will find a distributor willing to take a chance on this controversial topic. So please tell your friends, family, and your church and help build public support.

It needs to be released now, before OBAMACARE can do its damage!

8.24.2009

Only 27% of the nation's voters strongly approve of the job Obama is doing

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Just when it appears pro-abortion President Barack Obama has finally reached rock bottom in his approval ratings descent, he falls even lower. With the Obama administration not only pushing a pro-abortion health care bill but accusing pro-life groups of lying to the American people about it, Obama loses more and more support. The Rasmussen Reports daily presidential tracking poll for Sunday shows just 27% of the nation's voters strongly approve of the job Obama is doing as president. That contrasts with the 41 percent who strongly disapprove. Rasmussen tracks the views of voters who have the strongest feelings one way or another, calling it the Presidential Approval Index, and this rating of -14 is the lowest Obama has seen since he took over the White House in January. Some of the decline has come from within Obama's own party as only 49% of Democrats offer such a positive assessment of the president at this time. At the other end of the spectrum, today’s total for the Strongly Disapprove answer matches the highest level yet recorded. The 41% mark was reached just once before and that came one week ago today. Seventy percent of Republicans now Strongly Disapprove along with 49% of those not affiliated with either major party. Overall, using a more conventional analysis, only 48% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance while 51% now disapprove.

7.15.2009

Sotomayor Evades Questions About Board Membership on Pro-Abortion Group

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor evaded questions Tuesday afternoon from a senator who wanted to know more about the pro-abortion mission of a Hispanic group she served on the board of directors for during the 1980s.

Her comments followed remarks she gave earlier in the day saying the Roe v. Wade abortion case allowing virtually unlimited abortions any time during pregnancy is "settled law."

Sotomayor was a member of the board of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund from 1980 to 1992.

The New York Times notes that Sotomayor "was an involved and ardent supporter of their various legal efforts."

The group has come under fire for filing numerous amicus briefs with the Supreme Court each advocating an unlimited right to abortion throughout pregnancy and paid for at taxpayer expense.


Shared via AddThis